#housing

šŸ  Steep Lot, Failing Carport Challenge

A Rossland homeowner is seeking approval to replace their failing carport with a proper garage, but the steep topography means they need to build closer to property lines than normally allowed.

šŸ”ļø The challenge: Standard setback rules don't work on every lot

šŸ“‹ Council Decision: September 15th meeting

Council agenda - Development Variance Permit application
Location map
  • šŸšļø Existing carport has failing retaining walls and can't be safely used

  • ā›°ļø Steep slope from west to east limits building placement options

  • šŸš— Need to maintain 2 off-street parking spaces for road safety

  • ā„ļø Covered entrance will improve snow/drainage management

  • šŸ—ļø Alternative locations would require massive, expensive retaining walls

šŸ“‹ The Proposed Solution

  • šŸ  Build new 2-car garage to replace failing carport

  • šŸŽ† Add covered stairway over existing house entrance

  • šŸ“ Front setback: 0m instead of required 4m (4m variance)

šŸ“‹ The Proposed Solution

  • šŸ“Ž Side setback: 0.3m instead of required 1.8m (1.5m variance)

  • āœ… Staff recommend approval - no departmental concerns

Should Council approve these setback variances to allow the homeowner to replace their failing carport with a proper garage on this steep lot?

šŸ“… Your Voice Matters

Council Meeting: September 15, 2025

šŸ˜ļø All neighbors within 50m were notified - no objections received

šŸ—£ļø How to participate:

  • Attend the council meeting
  • Submit written comments
  • Contact your councillors

šŸ“œ This decision sets precedent for how variances are handled on steep terrain throughout Rossland.

Building Code Getting More Flexible? šŸ 

The Regional District of Kootenay Boundary wants to make building rules easier for property owners. They're proposing changes that could let you build small decks without permits and get clearer rules about tiny homes.

Council is deciding on Building Amendment Bylaw No. 1907 at their August 27th meeting - but do these changes actually help residents? šŸ¤”

Why These Changes Are Needed

  • šŸšļø Current building code has confusing rules about tiny homes on wheels

  • šŸ“‹ Property owners need clarity on when building permits are required

  • šŸ•ļø Recreational property owners want more flexibility for small outdoor structures

Why These Changes Are Needed

  • āš–ļø Tiny homes on wheels are now regulated as recreational vehicles under Motor Vehicle Act

  • šŸ› ļø Small deck projects often require expensive permits even for simple platforms

What's Actually Changing

  • āŒ Remove all tiny homes on wheels from building bylaw (they're now RVs)

  • āœ… Allow small decks under 10 square meters without building permits

  • šŸ“ Decks must be under 600mm high and freestanding only

What's Actually Changing

  • šŸ” Exemption limited to one small deck per property

  • šŸ“ Residential use only, must still follow zoning rules

Real Benefits for Property Owners

  • šŸ•ļø Build small platforms next to RVs at recreational properties

  • šŸ’° Save hundreds in permit fees for simple deck projects

  • ā±ļø Skip weeks of permit waiting for basic outdoor structures

Real Benefits for Property Owners

  • ♿ Create accessible platforms for seniors and mobility needs

  • šŸŽ† More flexibility for cottage and cabin owners

Do you think removing building permit requirements for small decks (under 10 square meters) will help property owners, or should all construction require permits for safety?

Next Steps & How to Participate

Council Decision: August 27, 2025 meeting

Process: Staff recommend three readings and adoption of Building Amendment Bylaw No. 1907

Participate: Attend council meeting, contact regional reps, or submit written comments

Impact: Changes take effect after adoption

Aug 27, 2025