
πͺ Behind Closed Doors?
Council wants to kick you out of part of Tuesday's meeting π₯β‘οΈπͺ
Two sensitive topics will be discussed without public oversight: β’ Personnel matters (hiring decisions) β’ Land deals (property acquisitions)
When does protecting privacy cross into secrecy? π€
ποΈ Closed sessions are legal under BC's Community Charter
βοΈ Required for sensitive topics that could harm individuals or city interests
π€ Protects employee privacy during hiring and disciplinary matters
π° Prevents interference with land negotiations and property deals
π Still must follow rules - can't just close meetings whenever they want
π₯ Personal information about current or potential city employees
π Land acquisition details that could drive up property prices if public
π Protects individuals from public scrutiny during job processes
π΅ Prevents speculation that could cost taxpayers more in land deals
β οΈ You'll miss decisions that could affect your neighborhood
What's the right balance between government transparency and protecting sensitive information? Should residents accept closed-door discussions for personnel and land matters, or do you want more public oversight even if it costs the city money?
Login Required
Login Required
π Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 4:30 PM Council Chambers, 310 Ward Street (2nd Floor)
Public portion: 4:30-6:00 PM, then 7:00 PM onwards Closed session: Happens mid-meeting
π£οΈ You can still: Attend open portions, ask questions during public time, request follow-up info after decisions are made