šŖ Behind Closed Doors?
Council wants to kick you out of part of Tuesday's meeting š„ā”ļøšŖ
Two sensitive topics will be discussed without public oversight: ā¢ Personnel matters (hiring decisions) ā¢ Land deals (property acquisitions)
When does protecting privacy cross into secrecy? š¤
šļø Closed sessions are legal under BC's Community Charter
āļø Required for sensitive topics that could harm individuals or city interests
š¤ Protects employee privacy during hiring and disciplinary matters
š° Prevents interference with land negotiations and property deals
š Still must follow rules - can't just close meetings whenever they want
š„ Personal information about current or potential city employees
š Land acquisition details that could drive up property prices if public
š Protects individuals from public scrutiny during job processes
šµ Prevents speculation that could cost taxpayers more in land deals
ā ļø You'll miss decisions that could affect your neighborhood
What's the right balance between government transparency and protecting sensitive information? Should residents accept closed-door discussions for personnel and land matters, or do you want more public oversight even if it costs the city money?
Login Required
Login Required
š Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 4:30 PM Council Chambers, 310 Ward Street (2nd Floor)
Public portion: 4:30-6:00 PM, then 7:00 PM onwards Closed session: Happens mid-meeting
š£ļø You can still: Attend open portions, ask questions during public time, request follow-up info after decisions are made